A Coast333 Case Study

Google Display Network Case Study: How Remarketing Helped Drive $1.9M in Revenue at a 708% ROI

Image ads, continuous A/B testing, and a disciplined remarketing campaign turned Display Network visibility into measurable, trackable purchases.

Quick summary: In this Google Display Network case study, a supplement manufacturer achieved a 708% return on ad spend and an estimated $1.9 million in revenue, by combining continuously tested Display image ads, keyword-researched Search campaigns, and a remarketing strategy that brought hesitant visitors back to complete a purchase.

Introduction

This Google Display Network case study looks at a supplement manufacturer specializing in weight gain products. The goal going in was simple to state and hard to deliver: increase online visibility in a way that actually improved return on investment, not just traffic for its own sake.

Our Strategy

Display Network image ads, continuously tested

The core of the strategy was spreading visibility across the Google Display Network using image ads and content ad variations, tested continuously against each other rather than launched once and left alone. Ongoing A/B testing is what separated this from a typical “set it and forget it” display campaign.

Search, built on real keyword research

Display wasn’t the only channel. A Search campaign was built on top of thorough keyword research, capturing the more direct, higher-intent searches that Display alone wouldn’t reach.

Remarketing to recover hesitant visitors

Not everyone buys on the first visit. A remarketing campaign brought people back to the site who had shown interest but hadn’t purchased yet, keeping the brand in front of warm prospects instead of losing that traffic for good.

What “View-Through Conversions” Means A view-through conversion happens when someone sees a display ad, doesn’t click it, but later comes back and purchases on their own. Standard reporting built around clicks alone misses these entirely. They matter because they reveal real revenue influence that click-based tracking simply can’t see.

The Results

Visibility increased quickly, and it translated into sales almost immediately, not just impressions.

708% Return on Ad Spend
$1.9M+ Estimated Total Revenue
+245% Growth in Trackable Conversions

Key results at a glance:

  • 708.22% value to cost ratio, roughly $7 in revenue for every $1 spent
  • Estimated total revenue exceeding $1.9 million since the strategy began
  • Directly trackable (1-per-click) conversions grew 245%, from 490 to 1,689
  • View-through conversions grew 854%, from 59 to 563, revealing revenue influence that click-only tracking would have missed entirely
  • Total campaign scale: 972,087 clicks and over 112 million impressions, at an average cost of $9.96 per conversion
Directly Trackable Conversions: Before vs. After
490 1,689 Before After

Conversions tracked directly to a click grew 245%, from 490 to 1,689.

View-Through Conversions: Before vs. After
59 563 Before After

View-through conversions, purchases influenced by an ad the visitor saw but didn’t click, grew 854%.

How the Revenue Figure Was Estimated Directly tracked conversions came to a confirmed conversion value of $1,716,317.90. View-through conversions can’t be tied to revenue directly, so that portion was estimated by multiplying the product’s average purchase price ($62.56) by the total number of view-through conversions (3,502), adding roughly $219,000 in estimated additional revenue. Combined, that produces the estimated total of $1,935,403.02 used to calculate the 708.22% value to cost ratio. We’re stating this plainly because the view-through portion is a reasonable estimate, not a directly confirmed number, and any Display Network or remarketing case study that doesn’t disclose that distinction is worth a second look.
“A visitor who sees an ad and buys three days later without ever clicking it still bought because of that ad. Click-only tracking just can’t see it.”

What Business Owners Can Learn

  • The Google Display Network can drive real revenue, not just impressions, when the creative is continuously tested rather than launched once and forgotten.
  • Click-based conversion tracking misses a real category of buyers. View-through conversions capture people who see an ad, don’t click, and purchase later on their own.
  • Search and Display work better together than either does alone. Search captures direct intent. Display builds the broader visibility that creates that intent in the first place.
  • Remarketing recovers revenue that would otherwise be lost the moment a visitor leaves without buying.
  • Any revenue estimate built on assumptions, like average purchase price applied to view-through conversions, should be disclosed as an estimate, not presented as a confirmed number.
Key Takeaway Trackable conversions alone grew 245%. The full picture, once view-through conversions were accounted for, showed an even larger impact. If your reporting only counts clicks, you may be underestimating what your advertising is actually doing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Google Display Network and how is it different from Search ads?

Search ads show up when someone actively types a query into Google. The Display Network instead shows image and content-based ads across a huge network of partner websites and apps, reaching people while they’re browsing, not actively searching. In this case study, Display Network ads with continuously A/B tested creative were the primary driver of new visibility, complemented by Search campaigns built from thorough keyword research.

What are view-through conversions, and why do they matter?

A view-through conversion happens when someone sees a display ad, doesn’t click it, but later goes on to make a purchase on their own. Standard conversion tracking often misses this entirely because it only counts conversions tied to a direct click. In this case study, view-through conversions grew 854% and represented a meaningful share of estimated revenue that would have been invisible to click-only reporting.

What’s a good ROI for Display Network advertising?

It varies significantly by product margin, price point, and industry, so there’s no single benchmark that applies everywhere. In this case study, the account achieved a value to cost ratio of 708.22%, meaning roughly $7 in revenue for every $1 spent, driven by continuous ad testing, thorough keyword research on the Search side, and a disciplined remarketing campaign working together rather than any single tactic alone.

How does remarketing help ecommerce sales?

Most visitors don’t purchase on their first visit to a site. Remarketing shows ads specifically to people who have already visited but haven’t bought yet, keeping the brand in front of warm prospects instead of letting that traffic disappear for good. In this case study, remarketing was a core part of the strategy alongside Display and Search, and is a meaningful contributor to the conversion growth seen across the account.

Final Thoughts

None of this came from one channel working in isolation. It came from Display building visibility, Search capturing direct intent, and remarketing recovering the visitors who needed a second look before buying, three channels working as one system rather than three separate campaigns.

If you’re not sure whether your own advertising is missing revenue that click-only tracking can’t see, that’s exactly the kind of question a Competitive Marketing Analysis is built to answer. It’s free, it takes a real look at where you stand, and there’s no pressure attached either way.

Ready to See Results Like This for Your Business?

Get a free, no-pressure look at where you stand and what’s actually possible.